Now they are blaming the whole thing on suicide bombers. But it doesn’t make much sense. None of the guys named had a motive other than being muslim, and a muslim does not make a terrorist. Take Shahzad Tanweer, for example. He was a 22 year old who was “proud to be British”, loved cricket and after he went on a trip to Pakistan to study religion he didn’t like “the heat, the poverty and the attitude the Pakistanis had towards people from England'’. Doesn’t sound like the kind of person to commit a “barbaric attack on civilization”, like Blair put it.

Furthermore, we are supposed to believe that these average people somehow managed to build bombs of their own. Yet the bombs had traces of military plastic explosive.

Superintendent Christophe Chaboud, head of the French security service’s Anti-terrorist Co-ordination Unit, said: “The use of military explosives is very worrying. We are more used to seeing home-made explosives made from chemicals. How did they procure them?

Either they were supplied by the underground market, for example from the Balkans, or they benefited from accomplices who removed explosives from a military base.”

Also, the official story completely ignores other facts, for example that three of the bombs went off almost simultaneosly, and that police shot “two two men wearing bombs” outside the HSBC tower at Canary Wharf. As you know, the “suicide bombers” were not “wearing” their bombs, and they were only four, not six.

Also consider this and this.

So what’s the truth? I guess we’ll never know.